These are the True Historical Facts of the Zapruder Film
The original Zapruder film stayed with Abraham Zapruder initially. He had copies made, and the FBI received one of these copies.
The FBI copy of the Zapruder film was indeed taken to Hawkeyeworks (Kodak's research and development lab) in Rochester, NY, for the purpose of creating enlargements. This was done to produce prints of specific frames, magnified up to 40 times, for investigational and presentation purposes, such as preparing materials for the Warren Commission. The CIA also had access to a version of the film at their National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC) in D.C., where they also produced enlargements.
While conspiracy theories about the Zapruder film's alteration exist, the official stance, supported by film experts and the National Archives, is that the original film was not altered. The film held by the National Archives is the original camera-original film.
The original Zapruder film was never at a facility where it could have been altered. This is a solid historical fact.
Dino Brugioni never saw the out of camera original Zapruder film he was lying and Douglas Horne fell for it.
Abraham Zapruder had posession of the film until he sold it to TIME-LIFE
Initial Handling: He allowed copies to be made for investigative purposes by the Secret Service, but retained the original.
Sale to Life: On the morning of November 23, 1963, Zapruder sold the print rights and eventually all rights to the film to Life magazine (part of Time-Life) for a total of $150,000. He did this with the understanding that Life would not exploit the graphic details of the assassination.
Later Ownership: In 1975, Time Inc. sold the film back to the Zapruder family for $1. In 1978, the film was placed in the National Archives for safekeeping. Finally, the U.S. government purchased the film from the family in 1999 for $16 million, though the family retained copyright, which they later donated to the Sixth Floor Museum.
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Specifically, the original camera print is stored at the Archives' facility in College Park, Maryland, in a cold-storage vault. While the National Archives owns the physical film, the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, holds the copyright.
This is the official version the CIA wants the simple-minded to believe in. Actually, Zapruder is massively faked and altered as extensively explained by Douglas Horne in "Altered History" and by John Costella in his nine-part video series. It is easy to see for instance that frame Z155 had a tire massively enlarged by fake painting, and the yellow car magically floats a foot off the pavement. Z220 shows the upper right corner of the sign partially flat near Jackie's hat, while other cut and paste attempts gave the sign a rounded corner. Willis Photo #5 compared to Zapruder shows Zapruder fakes the sign to be four times larger than it actually was. You can see in Willis #5 that Zapruder filmed under the sign to see JFK being shot in the shoulder and throat, but it doesn't show on Zapruder with the falsely enlarged sign. Willis shows Umbrella Man was behind the sign and ten feet down hill, but Zapruder fakes Umbrella Man to be in front of the sign and touching it. All through Zapruder the limousine falsely appears to never slow down. Dozens of witnesses saw it slow to a stop or nearly a stop near the book depository and at the bottom of the grassy knoll. If you look at frame Z349 and others, you see Clint Hill first hit the trunk with his hand a foot ahead of where he jumped for. Yeah, because the driver Greer was slamming on the brakes underneath his leap. You can also see earlier in Zapruder that the motorcycle cops are gaining on the limousine because of Greer's braking to help the shooters with their aim.
You can hide behind somebody else's petticoats all you want. It doesn't alter that fact that Zapruder is massively falsified as exposed by Douglas Horne in "Altered History" and by John
Costella in his nine-part expose youtube series. It also doesn't hide the fact that Babushka Lady was across Elm St. to back up Zapruder in case his camera failed. But it didn't, so the Babushka Lady version of the JFK assassination was given to the sniper assassination training program at Ft. Bragg where it was used to train Green Beret snipers. After it was shown to Dan Marvin's class, the instructor said it was "an excellent example of how to conduct an urban sniper assassination." Later the CIA at Ft. Bragg asked Dan Marvin to murder Lt. Cmdr. William Bruce Pitzer at Bethesda. He had a complete video copy of the warped faked JFK autopsy, and the brass didn't want it to ever see the light of day. Marvin declined the contract murder but someone else murdered Pitzer in his office and tried to make it look like a suicide.
Dino Antonio Brugioni was an American intelligence analyst. He was a senior official at the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center, working as an imagery analyst and also serving as NPIC's Chief of Information.
Get it Jackie Ow, Brugioni was CIA the prime perpetrators of the JFK assination. Of course Brugioni wanted to defame the best evidence of shots from the front that the Zapruder film shows...back and to the left. Jackie scambling on the trunk of the limo to pick up pieces of her husband's skull and brain.
If Brugioni is a dark evil lying agent of a dark evil lying CIA, why is he exposing their cover-up? Your attempt at an argument makes no sense. With or without Brugioni, it is self-evident from Zapruder itself it is full of fakery like Z155, Z220, the fake enlargement of the sign, Zapruder being able to film the wounding under the Stemmons sign even though that is censored, Greer slowing the limousine even though Zapruder is censored to cover that up also. If you want to go to your grave believing Zapruder is virgin pure, be my guest. But anyone who is not blind can see for themselves multiple things wrong with it, and such is formally explained by Doug Horne in "Altered History" and by John Costella in his nine part expose video series.
Surely, our species would go extinct tomorrow were it not for the brilliant and dazzling genius of William Whitten, inspiring all the little unworthy peasants with his immortal genius as he admires his visage in each and every passing stream, putting Adonis and Beattie to jealous shame while leaving Sigourney Weaver lusting and squirming for one, just one, just one romp in the hay.
Yea, a lot of people make wild claims connected to the JFK assassination.
Like James Files claiming he shot Kennedy. Files has subsequently been interviewed by others and discussed in multiple books pertaining to the assassination and related theories. In 1994, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was quoted as having investigated Files' allegation and found it "not credible".
Some people will do anything for publicity...even Douglas Horne.
Horne is demonstrably telling the truth while Files is demonstrably lying. You demonstrably avoid admitting that Zapruder is massively corrupted, and instead waffle with endless red herring irrelevancies.
This is some of the biggest load of bullshit I have ever read!
You are totally out of your mind!
\\][//
These are the True Historical Facts of the Zapruder Film
The original Zapruder film stayed with Abraham Zapruder initially. He had copies made, and the FBI received one of these copies.
The FBI copy of the Zapruder film was indeed taken to Hawkeyeworks (Kodak's research and development lab) in Rochester, NY, for the purpose of creating enlargements. This was done to produce prints of specific frames, magnified up to 40 times, for investigational and presentation purposes, such as preparing materials for the Warren Commission. The CIA also had access to a version of the film at their National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC) in D.C., where they also produced enlargements.
While conspiracy theories about the Zapruder film's alteration exist, the official stance, supported by film experts and the National Archives, is that the original film was not altered. The film held by the National Archives is the original camera-original film.
The original Zapruder film was never at a facility where it could have been altered. This is a solid historical fact.
Dino Brugioni never saw the out of camera original Zapruder film he was lying and Douglas Horne fell for it.
Abraham Zapruder had posession of the film until he sold it to TIME-LIFE
Initial Handling: He allowed copies to be made for investigative purposes by the Secret Service, but retained the original.
Sale to Life: On the morning of November 23, 1963, Zapruder sold the print rights and eventually all rights to the film to Life magazine (part of Time-Life) for a total of $150,000. He did this with the understanding that Life would not exploit the graphic details of the assassination.
Later Ownership: In 1975, Time Inc. sold the film back to the Zapruder family for $1. In 1978, the film was placed in the National Archives for safekeeping. Finally, the U.S. government purchased the film from the family in 1999 for $16 million, though the family retained copyright, which they later donated to the Sixth Floor Museum.
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Specifically, the original camera print is stored at the Archives' facility in College Park, Maryland, in a cold-storage vault. While the National Archives owns the physical film, the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, holds the copyright.
\\][//
This is the official version the CIA wants the simple-minded to believe in. Actually, Zapruder is massively faked and altered as extensively explained by Douglas Horne in "Altered History" and by John Costella in his nine-part video series. It is easy to see for instance that frame Z155 had a tire massively enlarged by fake painting, and the yellow car magically floats a foot off the pavement. Z220 shows the upper right corner of the sign partially flat near Jackie's hat, while other cut and paste attempts gave the sign a rounded corner. Willis Photo #5 compared to Zapruder shows Zapruder fakes the sign to be four times larger than it actually was. You can see in Willis #5 that Zapruder filmed under the sign to see JFK being shot in the shoulder and throat, but it doesn't show on Zapruder with the falsely enlarged sign. Willis shows Umbrella Man was behind the sign and ten feet down hill, but Zapruder fakes Umbrella Man to be in front of the sign and touching it. All through Zapruder the limousine falsely appears to never slow down. Dozens of witnesses saw it slow to a stop or nearly a stop near the book depository and at the bottom of the grassy knoll. If you look at frame Z349 and others, you see Clint Hill first hit the trunk with his hand a foot ahead of where he jumped for. Yeah, because the driver Greer was slamming on the brakes underneath his leap. You can also see earlier in Zapruder that the motorcycle cops are gaining on the limousine because of Greer's braking to help the shooters with their aim.
The theory of alteration of the Zapruder film is idiocy on par with Flat Earth, New Earth, and anti-evolution pseudoscience.
Abraham Zapruder had posession of the film until he sold it to TIME-LIFE.
\\][//
Whitten is always proud to display the limitations of his intellectual abilities and he certainly speaks for himself.
Roland Zavada Comments on the Zapruder Film Hoax
William Whitten -- Autodidact,
May 02, 2022
(9/23/03)
https://williamw.substack.com/p/roland-zavada-comments-on-the-zapruder
\\][//
You can hide behind somebody else's petticoats all you want. It doesn't alter that fact that Zapruder is massively falsified as exposed by Douglas Horne in "Altered History" and by John
Costella in his nine-part expose youtube series. It also doesn't hide the fact that Babushka Lady was across Elm St. to back up Zapruder in case his camera failed. But it didn't, so the Babushka Lady version of the JFK assassination was given to the sniper assassination training program at Ft. Bragg where it was used to train Green Beret snipers. After it was shown to Dan Marvin's class, the instructor said it was "an excellent example of how to conduct an urban sniper assassination." Later the CIA at Ft. Bragg asked Dan Marvin to murder Lt. Cmdr. William Bruce Pitzer at Bethesda. He had a complete video copy of the warped faked JFK autopsy, and the brass didn't want it to ever see the light of day. Marvin declined the contract murder but someone else murdered Pitzer in his office and tried to make it look like a suicide.
Dino Antonio Brugioni was an American intelligence analyst. He was a senior official at the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center, working as an imagery analyst and also serving as NPIC's Chief of Information.
Get it Jackie Ow, Brugioni was CIA the prime perpetrators of the JFK assination. Of course Brugioni wanted to defame the best evidence of shots from the front that the Zapruder film shows...back and to the left. Jackie scambling on the trunk of the limo to pick up pieces of her husband's skull and brain.
Don't be so naive.
\\][//
If Brugioni is a dark evil lying agent of a dark evil lying CIA, why is he exposing their cover-up? Your attempt at an argument makes no sense. With or without Brugioni, it is self-evident from Zapruder itself it is full of fakery like Z155, Z220, the fake enlargement of the sign, Zapruder being able to film the wounding under the Stemmons sign even though that is censored, Greer slowing the limousine even though Zapruder is censored to cover that up also. If you want to go to your grave believing Zapruder is virgin pure, be my guest. But anyone who is not blind can see for themselves multiple things wrong with it, and such is formally explained by Doug Horne in "Altered History" and by John Costella in his nine part expose video series.
Brugioni isn't revieling anything Jackie Ow, he is blowing smoke up your asses.
You are so fucking naive.
\\][//
Surely, our species would go extinct tomorrow were it not for the brilliant and dazzling genius of William Whitten, inspiring all the little unworthy peasants with his immortal genius as he admires his visage in each and every passing stream, putting Adonis and Beattie to jealous shame while leaving Sigourney Weaver lusting and squirming for one, just one, just one romp in the hay.
You need professional psychological help.
\\][//
**Roland Zavada Comments on the Zapruder Film Hoax**
William Whitten | May 02, 2022
(9/23/03)
It appears that here again, proponents of Z-film alteration believe
that the creation of all the required steps to achieve special effects in
theatrical motion picture are easily and equally applicable to 8mm film
taken with amateur consumer quality cameras rendered in such a way as
to replicate an original “in-camera” film without tell-tale image structure
characteristics. Nothing is farther from the truth and the author’s choice
of the word “created” may well be significant.
The reader of this dissertation is cautioned to consider the
complex characteristics of typical special effects cinematography.
Simply stated, to achieve special optical effects, it is necessary to
begin with a “family of film types”. Kodak designed camera original color
films to work compatibly with laboratory intermediate films and print films
as spectral dye “sets”. !Professional camera negative films were never
viewed directly and their transmission spectrum matched the spectral
sensitivity of intermediate (and print) films and the transmission dye set
of the intermediate films matched the spectral sensitivity of the final
print films. The print films dye transmission had reasonable visual
response with arc (or if printed properly) with tungsten projection.
In the case of the Zapruder film, the spectral sensitivity of a
daylight camera original Kodachrome reversal film was balanced for about
5900 deg. Kelvin with nominally parallel curves having gammas of about
1.8. Because it was a reversal (i.e. it yielded a positive image) the
spectral transmission characteristics of the dyes were designed for visual
response when projected with 32-3400 deg Kelvin illumination. !The film
was not designed for printing response so that its dye set matched the
spectral sensitivity of laboratory intermediate negative or positive films.
A reversal duplicating film was available, but that was for direct simple
copies, and not expected to be used as an intermediate. Further the
film’s daylight sensitivity; contrast and spectral characteristics do not
render it receptive for use as a “print” medium – hence, one “hell-of-a”
problem for someone trying to replicate a Kodachrome original (Note: the
goal now being to create a “Kodachrome original”) by using special
optical effects!
The goal to create a “Kodachrome original provides further
insurmountable challenges. Special optical effects for the cinema are
designed to fulfill story telling support in scenes rendered in such a way
that they are not obvious or disturbing to the audience. The author
wishes us to believe that unknown persons with unknown advanced
technology and film resources were able: to create a “Kodachrome
original” that would be subject to undetectable microscopic examination
and evaluation by multiple researchers. The “evidence” offered are scene
content anomalies and an a priori technical capability and expertise.
The limited comments above do not even begin to address image
structure constraints of grain; contrast and modulation transfer function
losses."~Roland Zavada
Read entire article at:
https://williamw.substack.com/p/roland-zavada-comments-on-the-zapruder
https://williamw.substack.com/p/roland-zavada-comments-on-the-zapruder
"the Babushka Lady version of the JFK assassination was given to the sniper assassination training program at Ft. Bragg."~Jackie Ow
Jeeze!!! Where to you get all of this bullshit?!?! Hahahaha!!!!! You are a lunatic.
\\][//
Dan Marvin was there and wrote about it. Ask Lt. Cmdr. Pitzer how funny it was to be shot in the head in his office.
Yea, a lot of people make wild claims connected to the JFK assassination.
Like James Files claiming he shot Kennedy. Files has subsequently been interviewed by others and discussed in multiple books pertaining to the assassination and related theories. In 1994, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was quoted as having investigated Files' allegation and found it "not credible".
Some people will do anything for publicity...even Douglas Horne.
\\][//
Horne is demonstrably telling the truth while Files is demonstrably lying. You demonstrably avoid admitting that Zapruder is massively corrupted, and instead waffle with endless red herring irrelevancies.